Quote:
Originally Posted by knapper I'm not sure you're being fair here. If you'd paid for a licence for vbullitein 3 when it was released in 2005, it would have cost you to this day $320 to keep it up to date. If the proposed system was in place it would have cost you $195. I would also say that the system they are adopting is a more common licensing model, rather than their present system. |
Maybe so but that is not my gripe - my gripe is that I have paid for an owned license, and am paying 30 dollars every year to get updates, why should I now need to shell out another 200 to upgrade when I already have paid 30 dollars for another year to do exactly this.
I can see where you are coming from for new customers, but for existing customers like myself it is nothing short of a rip-off, why should we pay 200 dollars or so to upgrade when we've already own the software, and under the agreement many many forums made they pay 30 to upgrade per year. Why extract more revenue from us?
You then have the people who have bought an owned license in the last month or two, already their 180 dollars investment in this will be worthless as soon as vB4 comes out they need to shell out yet another 200 just to upgrade the software. The other downside is that anytime vBulletin want some cash now, instead of releasing say 4.5 they will just release 5.0 as they know for sure it's another way to extract money out of people. The old system could not be abused, this one can.
Then you factor in the fact that all the development team who made it what it is pretty much have gone with the odd exception and on top of that they're not going to make beta releases (Which will obviously lead to a more bug filled software) they won't sell add-in's seprately and support will only be provided for 30 days and then you have to pay yet more money out, and you realise it's a black day. Some of the developers have been there for almost 10 years, it's surely not a co-incidence they walked out at the same time?